Directional limits on persistent gravitational waves from Advanced LIGO's first observing run
The LIGO Scientific Collaboration, the Virgo Collaboration: B. P., Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, M. R. Abernathy, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, C., Adams, T. Adams, P. Addesso, R. X. Adhikari, V. B. Adya, C. Affeldt, M., Agathos, K. Agatsuma, N. Aggarwal, O. D. Aguiar, L. Aiello

TL;DR
This paper uses Advanced LIGO data to search for persistent gravitational waves, setting upper limits on their strength and distribution across the sky, but finds no evidence of such signals.
Contribution
First application of gravitational-wave radiometry to map and test isotropy of the stochastic background using LIGO O1 data, establishing new upper limits.
Findings
No detection of gravitational waves from point sources or stochastic background.
Set upper limits on energy flux and energy density of gravitational waves.
Improved strain amplitude limits for specific astrophysical objects.
Abstract
We employ gravitational-wave radiometry to map the gravitational waves stochastic background expected from a variety of contributing mechanisms and test the assumption of isotropy using data from Advanced LIGO's first observing run. We also search for persistent gravitational waves from point sources with only minimal assumptions over the 20 - 1726 Hz frequency band. Finding no evidence of gravitational waves from either point sources or a stochastic background, we set limits at 90% confidence. For broadband point sources, we report upper limits on the gravitational wave energy flux per unit frequency in the range erg cm s Hz (f/25 Hz) depending on the sky location and the spectral power index . For extended sources, we report upper limits on the fractional gravitational wave energy…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
