How many scientific papers are mentioned in policy-related documents? An empirical investigation using Web of Science and Altmetric data
Robin Haunschild, Lutz Bornmann

TL;DR
This study investigates the prevalence of Web of Science papers mentioned in policy documents using Altmetric data, revealing less than 0.5% mention rate and emphasizing the need for ongoing tracking for impact assessment.
Contribution
It provides an empirical analysis of policy-related mentions of scientific papers using new altmetrics data from Altmetric, highlighting current limitations and future tracking needs.
Findings
Less than 0.5% of WoS papers are mentioned in policy documents
Mentions are sparse and vary across subject categories
Regular updates are needed for impact measurement
Abstract
In this short communication, we provide an overview of a relatively newly provided source of altmetrics data which could possibly be used for societal impact measurements in scientometrics. Recently, Altmetric - a start-up providing publication level metrics - started to make data for publications available which have been mentioned in policy-related documents. Using data from Altmetric, we study how many papers indexed in the Web of Science (WoS) are mentioned in policy-related documents. We find that less than 0.5% of the papers published in different subject categories are mentioned at least once in policy-related documents. Based on our results, we recommend that the analysis of (WoS) publications with at least one policy-related mention is repeated regularly (annually). Mentions in policy-related documents should not be used for impact measurement until new policy-related sites are…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
