Measuring field-normalized impact of papers on specific societal groups: An altmetrics study based on Mendeley data
Lutz Bornmann, Robin Haunschild

TL;DR
This study develops a target-oriented, field-normalized impact indicator based on Mendeley data to measure societal impact of papers on specific groups like students or educators, enhancing impact assessment precision.
Contribution
It extends the MNRS indicator to target-specific impact measurement, enabling evaluation of papers' influence on particular societal sectors such as education.
Findings
Demonstrates the indicator's ability to assess impact on specific societal groups.
Shows how journals and institutions can be evaluated for impact on targeted sectors.
Provides empirical examples of impact measurement on educational and teaching sectors.
Abstract
Bibliometrics is successful in measuring impact, because the target is clearly defined: the publishing scientist who is still active and working. Thus, citations are a target-oriented metric which measures impact on science. In contrast, societal impact measurements based on altmetrics are as a rule intended to measure impact in a broad sense on all areas of society (e.g. science, culture, politics, and economics). This tendency is especially reflected in the efforts to design composite indicators (e.g. the Altmetric attention score). We deem appropriate that not only the impact measurement using citations is target-oriented (citations measure the impact of papers on scientists), but also the measurement of impact using altmetrics. Impact measurements only make sense, if the target group - the recipient of academic papers - is clearly defined. Thus, we extend in this study the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
