Asteroseismic analysis of two alpha-enhanced stars KIC 7976303 and KIC 8694723
Z. S. Ge, S. L. Bi, T. D. Li, K. Liu, Z. J. Tian, W. M. Yang, Z. E., Liu, and J. Yu

TL;DR
This study uses asteroseismic data and stellar models with varying alpha-element enhancements to accurately determine the properties of two alpha-enhanced stars, highlighting the importance of including alpha-enhancement in stellar modeling.
Contribution
It demonstrates that alpha-enhanced models provide better fits for certain evolved stars and refine stellar parameter estimates compared to standard models.
Findings
Alpha-enhanced models fit KIC 7976303 better than non-enhanced models.
Including alpha-enhancement alters estimated stellar masses and ages.
Results support using alpha-enhanced models for metal-poor and globular cluster stars.
Abstract
We intent to use stellar models with and without alpha-enhancement, as well as asteroseismic analysis, to study two alpha-enhanced stars, KIC 7976303 and KIC 8694723. For the alpha-enhanced models, we adopt [alpha/Fe] = 0.2, and 0.4. For the evolved sub-giant KIC 7976303 with mixed-modes, alpha-enhanced models fit the observations better than the models without alpha-enhancement, and point to a star with M = 1.20 0.02 M_odot, t = 4.88 0.08 Gyr, R = 2.04 0.01 R_odot, and L = 5.07 0.05 L_odot. For the post turnoff star KIC 8694723, we find that the models fit the observations well in all three cases ([alpha/Fe] = 0.0, 0.2, 0.4). According to the observed metal abundances, only alpha- enhanced models are used to estimate the stellar parameters, which are M = 1.13 0.06 M_odot, t = 5.47 0.43 Gyr, R = 1.55 0.13 R_odot, and L = 3.18 0.26 L_odot.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
