The effect of $SU(2)$ symmetry on many-body localization and thermalization
Ivan V. Protopopov, Wen Wei Ho, and Dmitry A. Abanin

TL;DR
This paper investigates how $SU(2)$ symmetry affects many-body localization, revealing that such symmetry prevents conventional MBL, leads to a non-ergodic phase with logarithmic entanglement scaling, and generally promotes thermalization.
Contribution
The study constructs a fixed-point Hamiltonian demonstrating a non-ergodic phase under $SU(2)$ symmetry and analyzes its instability, providing new insights into non-Abelian symmetry effects on many-body localization.
Findings
$SU(2)$ symmetry prevents conventional MBL.
A non-ergodic phase with logarithmic entanglement scaling is identified.
Weak symmetric perturbations induce multi-spin resonances, destabilizing the phase.
Abstract
The many-body localized (MBL) phase is characterized by a complete set of quasi-local integrals of motion and area-law entanglement of excited eigenstates. We study the effect of non-Abelian continuous symmetries on MBL, considering the case of symmetric disordered spin chains. The symmetry imposes strong constraints on the entanglement structure of the eigenstates, precluding conventional MBL. We construct a fixed-point Hamiltonian, which realizes a non-ergodic (but non-MBL) phase characterized by eigenstates having logarithmic scaling of entanglement with the system size, as well as an incomplete set of quasi-local integrals of motion. We study the response of such a phase to local symmetric perturbations, finding that even weak perturbations induce multi-spin resonances. We conclude that the non-ergodic phase is generally unstable and that symmetry implies…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
