Non-manifold monodromy spaces of branched coverings between manifolds
Martina Aaltonen

TL;DR
This paper investigates the properties of monodromy spaces associated with branched coverings between manifolds, revealing that in three dimensions, these spaces can be non-manifold and lack local contractibility, unlike the two-dimensional case.
Contribution
The paper demonstrates that the monodromy space of a proper branched cover in three dimensions need not be a manifold, extending the understanding of branched covers beyond two dimensions.
Findings
Monodromy spaces can be non-manifold in 3D
Constructed a self-map of the 3-sphere with non-manifold monodromy space
Contrasts with the 2D case where monodromy spaces are manifolds
Abstract
By a construction of Berstein and Edmonds every proper branched cover f between manifolds is a factor of a branched covering orbit map from a locally connected and locally compact Hausdorff space called the monodromy space of f to the target manifold. For proper branched covers between 2-manifolds the monodromy space is known to be a manifold. We show that this does not generalize to dimension 3 by constructing a self-map of the 3-sphere for which the monodromy space is not a locally contractible space.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
