MF is always superior to CEM
Xiurui Geng, Luyan Ji, Weitun Yang, Fuxiang Wang, Yongchao Zhao

TL;DR
This paper proves that the classical matched filter (MF) always outperforms the constrained energy minimization (CEM) in target detection, establishing their mathematical equivalence and demonstrating MF's superiority.
Contribution
The paper introduces an augmented CEM (ACEM) and proves its equivalence to MF, showing MF's consistent superiority over CEM in detection performance.
Findings
MF is mathematically equivalent to ACEM
ACEM outperforms CEM in detection tasks
MF always yields better results than CEM
Abstract
The constrained energy minimization (CEM) and matched filter (MF) are two most frequently used target detection algorithms in the remotely sensed community. In this paper, we first introduce an augmented CEM (ACEM) by adding an all-one band. According to a recently published conclusion that CEM can always achieve a better performance by adding any linearly independent bands, ACEM is better than CEM. Further, we prove that ACEM is mathematically equivalent to MF. As a result, we can conclude that the classical matched filter (MF) is always superior to the CEM operator.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsElectromagnetic Scattering and Analysis · Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and Techniques
