Comment on 'Attempts to test an alternative electrodynamic theory of superconductors by low-temperature scanning tunneling and atomic force microscopy'
S C Tiwari

TL;DR
This paper critiques Hirsch's alternative electrodynamics theory of superconductors, arguing it is mathematically flawed and gauge non-invariant, thus questioning the validity of experiments designed to test it.
Contribution
It provides a critical analysis showing the theoretical and conceptual flaws in Hirsch's proposed electrodynamics of superconductivity.
Findings
Hirsch's theory lacks mathematical rigour
The theory is gauge non-invariant
Experimental tests based on the theory are inconclusive
Abstract
It is argued that alternative electrodynamics of superconductivity proposed by Hirsch lacks mathematical rigour and it is conceptually flawed. Gauge non-invariance of the theory makes justification of the experiment reported in [arXiv:1607.05060] to test its prediction doubtful. It seems even with improved techniques the outcome would remain inconclusive.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPhysics of Superconductivity and Magnetism · Surface and Thin Film Phenomena · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications
