Exploring Cosmic Origins with CORE: Cosmological Parameters
Eleonora Di Valentino, Thejs Brinckmann, Martina Gerbino, Vivian, Poulin, Fran\c{c}ois R. Bouchet, Julien Lesgourgues, Alessandro Melchiorri,, Jens Chluba, Sebastien Clesse, Jacques Delabrouille, Cora Dvorkin, Francesco, Forastieri, Silvia Galli, Deanna C. Hooper

TL;DR
The paper forecasts the potential of the CORE space mission to significantly improve constraints on fundamental cosmological parameters by mapping the CMB polarization, considering instrumental options and combining data with future large-scale structure surveys.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive forecast of CORE's capabilities to constrain a wide range of cosmological parameters within the LCDM framework, including potential improvements over Planck and synergy with other surveys.
Findings
CORE can substantially tighten constraints on curvature, neutrino physics, and dark energy.
Instrumental choices like telescope size and sensitivity impact parameter constraints.
Combining CORE data with DESI and Euclid enhances cosmological parameter precision.
Abstract
We forecast the main cosmological parameter constraints achievable with the CORE space mission which is dedicated to mapping the polarisation of the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB). CORE was recently submitted in response to ESA's fifth call for medium-sized mission proposals (M5). Here we report the results from our pre-submission study of the impact of various instrumental options, in particular the telescope size and sensitivity level, and review the great, transformative potential of the mission as proposed. Specifically, we assess the impact on a broad range of fundamental parameters of our Universe as a function of the expected CMB characteristics, with other papers in the series focusing on controlling astrophysical and instrumental residual systematics. In this paper, we assume that only a few central CORE frequency channels are usable for our purpose, all others being devoted…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
