Comparing Apples and Oranges: Two Examples of the Limits of Statistical Inference, With an Application to Google Advertising Markets
John Mount, Nina Zumel

TL;DR
This paper explores the fundamental limits of statistical inference in estimating multiple parameters simultaneously, using Google advertising data as a case study to illustrate the constraints imposed by the Cramer-Rao bound.
Contribution
It demonstrates how the Cramer-Rao bound constrains the accuracy of estimating numerous Google Ad campaign metrics and highlights the limitations in large-scale A/B testing.
Findings
The Cramer-Rao bound sets a fundamental limit on estimation accuracy.
Simultaneous estimation of many parameters faces inherent precision constraints.
Implications for large-scale online experiments and advertising analytics.
Abstract
We show how the classic Cramer-Rao bound limits how accurately one can simultaneously estimate values of a large number of Google Ad campaigns (or similarly limit the measurement rate of many confounding A/B tests).
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsWireless Communication Security Techniques · Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms · Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research
