Higher-order baryon number susceptibilities: interplay between the chiral and the nuclear liquid-gas transitions
A. Mukherjee, S. Schramm, J. Steinheimer

TL;DR
This paper employs an improved SU(3) parity-doublet quark-hadron model to study higher-order baryon number susceptibilities, revealing a significant interplay between chiral and nuclear liquid-gas transitions affecting experimental cumulant measurements.
Contribution
It introduces higher-order scalar interactions into the parity-doublet model, enhancing the description of nuclear properties and phase diagram features relevant to QCD transitions.
Findings
Phase diagram shows crossover at zero chemical potential and a critical point at finite density.
Strong interplay observed between chiral and liquid-gas transitions at intermediate densities.
Baryon number cumulants vary significantly with freeze-out temperature and transition interplay.
Abstract
We use an improved version of the SU(3) flavour parity-doublet quark-hadron model to investigate the higher order baryon number susceptibilities near the chiral and the nuclear liquid-gas transitions. The parity-doublet model has been improved by adding higher-order interaction terms of the scalar fields in the effective mean field Lagrangian, resulting in a much-improved description of nuclear ground-state properties, in particular the nuclear compressibility. The resulting phase diagram of the model agrees qualitatively with expectations from lattice QCD, i.e., it shows a crossover at zero net baryo-chemical potential and a critical point at finite density. Using this model, we investigate the dependence of the higher-order baryon number susceptibilities as function of temperature and chemical potential. We observe a strong interplay between the chiral and liquid-gas transition at…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
