Non-perturbative aspects of Euclidean Yang-Mills theories in linear covariant gauges: Nielsen identities and a BRST invariant two-point correlation function
M. A. L. Capri, D. Dudal, A. D. Pereira, D. Fiorentini, M. S., Guimaraes, B. W. Mintz, L. F. Palhares, S. P. Sorella

TL;DR
This paper develops a gauge-invariant, BRST invariant two-point correlation function in Euclidean Yang-Mills theories, linking it to non-perturbative phenomena like gluon confinement and the pole structure of gauge bosons.
Contribution
It introduces a gauge-invariant transverse configuration A^h and constructs a BRST invariant correlator <A^h A^h> that characterizes non-perturbative aspects independently of gauge parameters.
Findings
Poles of <A^h A^h> match those of the gluon propagator's transverse part.
Nielsen identities show gauge parameter independence of these poles.
<A^h A^h> provides a gauge-invariant interpretation of positivity violation and gluon confinement.
Abstract
In order to construct a gauge invariant two-point function in a Yang-Mills theory, we propose the use of the all-order gauge invariant transverse configurations A^h. Such configurations can be obtained through the minimization of the functional A^2_{min} along the gauge orbit within the BRST invariant formulation of the Gribov-Zwanziger framework recently put forward in [1,2] for the class of the linear covariant gauges. This correlator turns out to provide a characterization of non-perturbative aspects of the theory in a BRST invariant and gauge parameter independent way. In particular, it turns out that the poles of <A^h A^h> are the same as those of the transverse part of the gluon propagator, which are also formally shown to be independent of the gauge parameter entering the gauge condition through the Nielsen identities. The latter follow from the new exact BRST invariant…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
