Robust Variational Inference
Michael Figurnov, Kirill Struminsky, Dmitry Vetrov

TL;DR
This paper introduces a robust modification to variational inference that improves performance when training data contains many noisy or uninformative samples, demonstrated through experiments on autoencoders with noisy datasets.
Contribution
It proposes a new robust variational objective and evidence lower bound that are effective in noisy data scenarios, enhancing inference robustness.
Findings
Improved performance on synthetic noisy datasets.
Small but consistent gains on original datasets.
Robust objective outperforms traditional evidence lower bound.
Abstract
Variational inference is a powerful tool for approximate inference. However, it mainly focuses on the evidence lower bound as variational objective and the development of other measures for variational inference is a promising area of research. This paper proposes a robust modification of evidence and a lower bound for the evidence, which is applicable when the majority of the training set samples are random noise objects. We provide experiments for variational autoencoders to show advantage of the objective over the evidence lower bound on synthetic datasets obtained by adding uninformative noise objects to MNIST and OMNIGLOT. Additionally, for the original MNIST and OMNIGLOT datasets we observe a small improvement over the non-robust evidence lower bound.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning · Machine Learning and Algorithms · Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
