A comparison study of object-oriented database clustering techniques
J\'er\^ome Darmont (LIMOS), Le Gruenwald

TL;DR
This paper compares three object clustering algorithms for object-oriented databases, demonstrating that CK outperforms Cactis and ORION in response time and overhead through simulation experiments.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of clustering techniques, highlighting the superior performance of the CK algorithm in OODB environments.
Findings
CK algorithm outperforms Cactis and ORION in response time
CK has lower clustering overhead
Cactis is better than ORION in some scenarios
Abstract
It is widely acknowledged that a good object clustering is critical to the performance of OODBs. Clustering means storing related objects close together on secondary storage so that when one object is accessed from disk, all its related objects are also brought into memory. Then access to these related objects is a main memory access that is much faster than a disk access. The aim of this paper is to compare the performance of three clustering algorithms: Cactis, CK and ORION. Simulation experiments we performed showed that the Cactis algorithm is better than the ORION algorithm and that the CK algorithm totally out-performs both other algorithms in terms of response time and clustering overhead.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
