Exponential Separation of Quantum Communication and Classical Information
Anurag Anshu, Dave Touchette, Penghui Yao, and Nengkun Yu

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates an exponential separation between quantum communication complexity and classical information complexity for a specific Boolean function, revealing their fundamental incomparability and implications for quantum communication theory.
Contribution
It provides the first exponential separation showing quantum communication complexity can be exponentially larger than classical information complexity for a specific function.
Findings
Quantum communication complexity is polynomially equivalent to classical communication complexity for the Symmetric k-ary Pointer Jumping function.
Classical information complexity is an upper bound on quantum information complexity, but they are incomparable.
A simple proof of the optimal trade-off in the Greater-Than function communication complexity, even with entanglement.
Abstract
We exhibit a Boolean function for which the quantum communication complexity is exponentially larger than the classical information complexity. An exponential separation in the other direction was already known from the work of Kerenidis et. al. [SICOMP 44, pp. 1550-1572], hence our work implies that these two complexity measures are incomparable. As classical information complexity is an upper bound on quantum information complexity, which in turn is equal to amortized quantum communication complexity, our work implies that a tight direct sum result for distributional quantum communication complexity cannot hold. The function we use to present such a separation is the Symmetric k-ary Pointer Jumping function introduced by Rao and Sinha [ECCC TR15-057], whose classical communication complexity is exponentially larger than its classical information complexity. In this paper, we show that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
