Comment on A First-order Phase Transition to Metallic Hydrogen
Alexander F. Goncharov, Zachary M. Geballe

TL;DR
This paper critically examines claims of a first-order phase transition to metallic hydrogen, arguing that the data and interpretation by Zaghoo et al. are inconsistent and do not conclusively demonstrate metallic behavior.
Contribution
The authors provide a detailed critique of previous optical data interpretations, emphasizing the importance of energy-dependent conductivity measurements and challenging claims of a first-order transition.
Findings
Optical data do not conclusively show metallic hydrogen.
The high-temperature state is likely not metallic.
Data cannot distinguish between different phase transition types.
Abstract
A recent paper by Zaghoo et al. presents optical data at high-pressure and high-temperature and interprets the data as evidence for a first-order phase transition to metallic hydrogen during heating. Here we argue that the presented data are contradictory with these claims. Elucidating this issue is important for building a coherent picture that is emerging as the results of theoretical calculations of various levels and experimental investigations employing static and dynamic compression techniques. In this context, the use of adequate probes of the electronic and chemical state is crucial. Optical probes that do not address the energy dependent conductivity while making multiple references to the Drude model are highly speculative. Indeed, the available dynamic and static compression data and theoretical modeling show that study of energy dependent conductivity is important for…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
