Standing on the shoulders of Dwarfs: the Kepler asteroseismic LEGACY sample II - radii, masses, and ages
Victor Silva Aguirre, Mikkel N. Lund, H. M. Antia, Warrick H. Ball,, Sarbani Basu, J{\o}rgen Christensen-Dalsgaard, Yveline Lebreton, Daniel R., Reese, Kuldeep Verma, Luca Casagrande, Anders B. Justesen, Jakob R., Mosumgaard, William J. Chaplin, Timothy R. Bedding, Guy R. Davies

TL;DR
This study uses Kepler asteroseismic data to precisely determine fundamental properties of 66 main-sequence stars, achieving high accuracy and consistency across different modeling approaches, and providing a valuable, well-characterized stellar sample.
Contribution
The paper presents a comprehensive analysis of 66 main-sequence stars using multiple modeling methods, achieving unprecedented precision and consistency in stellar radii, masses, and ages, and making the data publicly available.
Findings
Average uncertainties: ~2% in radius, ~4% in mass, ~10% in age.
Excellent agreement with Sun, Gaia, and binary data.
Robustness of asteroseismic parameters confirmed.
Abstract
We use asteroseismic data from the Kepler satellite to determine fundamental stellar properties of the 66 main-sequence targets observed for at least one full year by the mission. We distributed tens of individual oscillation frequencies extracted from the time series of each star among seven modelling teams who applied different methods to determine radii, masses, and ages for all stars in the sample. Comparisons among the different results reveal a good level of agreement in all stellar properties, which is remarkable considering the variety of codes, input physics and analysis methods employed by the different teams. Average uncertainties are of the order of 2\% in radius, 4\% in mass, and 10\% in age, making this the best-characterised sample of main-sequence stars available to date. Our predicted initial abundances and mixing-length parameters are checked against…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
