Bipolar Weighted Argumentation Graphs

TL;DR

This paper explores the semantics of bipolar weighted argumentation graphs, which include both support and attack relations, extending previous work on unipolar graphs to handle more complex argument structures.

Contribution

It introduces a framework for analyzing bipolar argumentation graphs, combining support and attack semantics, building upon prior models that considered only one type of relation.

Findings

Develops semantics for bipolar argumentation graphs

Extends existing models to include support and attack

Provides a unified approach for bipolar argumentation analysis

Abstract

This paper discusses the semantics of weighted argumentation graphs that are biplor, i.e. contain both attacks and support graphs. The work builds on previous work by Amgoud, Ben-Naim et. al., which presents and compares several semantics for argumentation graphs that contain only supports or only attacks relationships, respectively.