The 2015-2017 policy changes to the means-tests of Australian Age Pension: implication to decisions in retirement
Johan G. Andreasson, Pavel V. Shevchenko

TL;DR
This paper models how recent Australian Age Pension policy changes from 2015-2017 affect retirees' optimal consumption, investment, and housing decisions using a lifecycle utility maximization framework.
Contribution
It introduces a stochastic control model incorporating policy changes, regulatory rules, and asset rebalancing to analyze their impact on retirement decision-making.
Findings
Policy changes reduce benefits from means-test-based planning.
Housing allocation slightly increases to maximize Age Pension.
Deeming income rules significantly affect pension receipt for wealthier households.
Abstract
The Australian Government uses the means-test as a way of managing the pension budget. Changes in Age Pension policy impose difficulties in retirement modelling due to policy risk, but any major changes tend to be `grandfathered' meaning that current retirees are exempt from the new changes. In 2015, two important changes were made in regards to allocated pension accounts -- the income means-test is now based on deemed income rather than account withdrawals, and the income-test deduction no longer applies. We examine the implications of the new changes in regards to optimal decisions for consumption, investment, and housing. We account for regulatory minimum withdrawal rules that are imposed by regulations on allocated pension accounts, as well as the 2017 asset-test rebalancing. The new policy changes are modelled in a utility maximizing lifecycle model and solved as an optimal…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
