Identifying Significant Predictive Bias in Classifiers
Zhe Zhang, Daniel B. Neill

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new subset scan method to detect and interpret statistically significant biases in probabilistic classifiers across all possible subgroups, enhancing model fairness assessment.
Contribution
The paper presents a novel subset scan approach combined with bootstrap methods to identify biased subgroups and interpret classifier biases comprehensively.
Findings
Detected significant biases in COMPAS and credit data
Identified subgroups with high classification errors
Extended method to penalize subgroup complexity
Abstract
We present a novel subset scan method to detect if a probabilistic binary classifier has statistically significant bias -- over or under predicting the risk -- for some subgroup, and identify the characteristics of this subgroup. This form of model checking and goodness-of-fit test provides a way to interpretably detect the presence of classifier bias or regions of poor classifier fit. This allows consideration of not just subgroups of a priori interest or small dimensions, but the space of all possible subgroups of features. To address the difficulty of considering these exponentially many possible subgroups, we use subset scan and parametric bootstrap-based methods. Extending this method, we can penalize the complexity of the detected subgroup and also identify subgroups with high classification errors. We demonstrate these methods and find interesting results on the COMPAS crime…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsImbalanced Data Classification Techniques · Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance · Benford’s Law and Fraud Detection
