When "Optimal Filtering" Isn't
J. W. Fowler, B. K. Alpert, W. B. Doriese, J. Hays-Wehle, Y.-I. Joe,, K. M. Morgan, G. C. O'Neil, C. D. Reintsema, D. R. Schmidt, J. N. Ullom, and, D. S. Swetz

TL;DR
This paper introduces tangent filtering, a pulse-fitting method that accounts for energy-dependent pulse shapes in nonlinear detectors, leading to improved energy resolution in x-ray microcalorimetry.
Contribution
The paper presents a geometric approach to pulse fitting that incorporates energy-dependent pulse shapes, enhancing resolution over traditional optimal filtering methods.
Findings
Resolution improved from 4.9 eV to 4.2 eV at Cu Kα line
Method predicts potential resolution gains based on pulse shape analysis
Demonstrated with case study on transition metal fluorescence
Abstract
The so-called "optimal filter" analysis of a microcalorimeter's x-ray pulses is statistically optimal only if all pulses have the same shape, regardless of energy. The shapes of pulses from a nonlinear detector can and do depend on the pulse energy, however. A pulse-fitting procedure that we call "tangent filtering" accounts for the energy dependence of the shape and should therefore achieve superior energy resolution. We take a geometric view of the pulse-fitting problem and give expressions to predict how much the energy resolution stands to benefit from such a procedure. We also demonstrate the method with a case study of K-line fluorescence from several 3d transition metals. The method improves the resolution from 4.9 eV to 4.2 eV at the Cu K line (8.0keV).
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsWater Systems and Optimization · Target Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks · Flow Measurement and Analysis
