Modulation of the superconducting critical temperature due to quantum confinement at the LaAlO$_3$/SrTiO$_3$ interface
D. Valentinis, S. Gariglio, A. F\^ete, J.-M. Triscone, C. Berthod, and, D. van der Marel

TL;DR
This paper explains the dome-shaped dependence of the superconducting critical temperature at the LaAlO$_3$/SrTiO$_3$ interface as a quantum confinement shape resonance, supported by theoretical modeling and comparison with experimental data.
Contribution
It introduces a quantum confinement model to explain the $T_c$ dome at the LaAlO$_3$/SrTiO$_3$ interface, highlighting the role of heavy bands and shape resonance effects.
Findings
The $T_c$ dome is explained by quantum confinement effects.
Comparison of 3D and 2D models highlights the importance of heavy bands.
Calculated $T_c$ matches experimental transport data.
Abstract
Superconductivity develops in bulk doped SrTiO and at the LaAlO/SrTiO interface with a dome-shaped density dependence of the critical temperature , despite different dimensionalities and geometries. We propose that the dome of LaAlO/SrTiO is a shape resonance due to quantum confinement of superconducting bulk SrTiO. We substantiate this interpretation by comparing the exact solutions of a three-dimensional and quasi-two-dimensional two-band BCS gap equation. This comparison highlights the role of heavy bands for in both geometries. For bulk SrTiO, we extract the density dependence of the pairing interaction from the fit to experimental data. We apply quantum confinement in a square potential well of finite depth and calculate in the confined configuration. We compare the calculated to transport experiments and provide an…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
