A BCool survey of the magnetic fields of planet-hosting solar-type stars
M. W. Mengel, S. C. Marsden, B. D. Carter, J. Horner, R. King, R., Fares, S. V. Jeffers, P. Petit, A. A. Vidotto, J. Morin, the BCool, Collaboration

TL;DR
This study surveys the magnetic fields of solar-type stars hosting planets, finding no clear influence of close-in planets on stellar magnetic activity, which remains primarily correlated with rotation, age, and activity proxies.
Contribution
It provides new magnetic field measurements of 19 additional planet-hosting stars, expanding understanding of star-planet magnetic interactions and identifying targets for Zeeman Doppler Mapping.
Findings
Magnetic activity levels are consistent with the overall BCool sample.
No detectable effect of close-in planets on stellar magnetic fields.
Four stars show unambiguous magnetic fields, including two subgiants.
Abstract
We present a spectropolarimetric snapshot survey of solar-type planet hosting stars. In addition to 14 planet-hosting stars observed as part of the BCool magnetic snapshot survey, we obtained magnetic observations of a further 19 planet-hosting solar-type stars in order to see if the presence of close-in planets had an effect on the measured surface magnetic field (|B|). Our results indicate that the magnetic activity of this sample is congruent with that of the overall BCool sample. The effects of the planetary systems on the magnetic activity of the parent star, if any, are too subtle to detect compared to the intrinsic dispersion and correlations with rotation, age and stellar activity proxies in our sample. Four of the 19 newly observed stars, two of which are subgiants, have unambiguously detected magnetic fields and are future targets for Zeeman Doppler Mapping.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
