An ultraviolet excess in the superluminous supernova Gaia16apd reveals a powerful central engine
M. Nicholl, E. Berger, R. Margutti, P. K. Blanchard, D. Milisavljevic,, P. Challis, B. D. Metzger, R. Chornock

TL;DR
Gaia16apd's extreme ultraviolet excess reveals a powerful central engine, supporting the magnetar model for hydrogen-poor superluminous supernovae and providing insights into their rapid UV evolution and high peak temperatures.
Contribution
This study presents long-term UV and optical observations of Gaia16apd, demonstrating that its UV excess is due to a more powerful central engine rather than environmental factors, supporting the magnetar hypothesis.
Findings
Gaia16apd has a hotter continuum at maximum light than other SLSNe.
The UV excess declines rapidly, aligning with typical SLSNe after 10-15 days.
A magnetar with specific parameters can explain the observed light curve and temperature evolution.
Abstract
Since the discovery of superluminous supernovae (SLSNe) in the last decade, it has been known that these events exhibit bluer spectral energy distributions than other supernova subtypes, with significant output in the ultraviolet. However, the event Gaia16apd seems to outshine even the other SLSNe at rest-frame wavelengths below \AA. Yan et al (2016) have recently presented HST UV spectra and attributed the UV flux to low metallicity and hence reduced line blanketing. Here we present UV and optical light curves over a longer baseline in time, revealing a rapid decline at UV wavelengths despite a typical optical evolution. Combining the published UV spectra with our own optical data, we demonstrate that Gaia16apd has a much hotter continuum than virtually any SLSN at maximum light, but it cools rapidly thereafter and is indistinguishable from the others by -15 days…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
