Cosmic Bell Test: Measurement Settings from Milky Way Stars
Johannes Handsteiner, Andrew S. Friedman, Dominik Rauch, Jason, Gallicchio, Bo Liu, Hannes Hosp, Johannes Kofler, David Bricher, Matthias, Fink, Calvin Leung, Anthony Mark, Hien T. Nguyen, Isabella Sanders, Fabian, Steinlechner, Rupert Ursin, S\"oren Wengerowsky, Alan H. Guth

TL;DR
This experiment used distant stars to determine measurement settings in a Bell test, significantly closing the 'freedom of choice' loophole by pushing back the possible influence time to about 600 years ago.
Contribution
First to employ astronomical sources as measurement setting generators in a Bell test, enhancing the closure of the freedom-of-choice loophole.
Findings
Observed Bell inequality violations with high statistical significance.
Pushed back the earliest possible influence time to approximately 600 years ago.
Confirmed quantum entanglement correlations under cosmic setting choices.
Abstract
Bell's theorem states that some predictions of quantum mechanics cannot be reproduced by a local-realist theory. That conflict is expressed by Bell's inequality, which is usually derived under the assumption that there are no statistical correlations between the choices of measurement settings and anything else that can causally affect the measurement outcomes. In previous experiments, this "freedom of choice" was addressed by ensuring that selection of measurement settings via conventional "quantum random number generators" was space-like separated from the entangled particle creation. This, however, left open the possibility that an unknown cause affected both the setting choices and measurement outcomes as recently as mere microseconds before each experimental trial. Here we report on a new experimental test of Bell's inequality that, for the first time, uses distant astronomical…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
