Influence of the fluid structure on the binding potential: comparing liquid drop profiles from density functional theory with results from mesoscopic theory
Adam P. Hughes, Uwe Thiele, Andrew J. Archer

TL;DR
This paper compares microscopic density functional theory (DFT) calculations of the binding potential for simple liquids with mesoscale models, showing good agreement and revealing oscillatory decay and terraced droplet structures at low temperatures.
Contribution
It demonstrates the use of continuum DFT to accurately compute binding potentials and validate mesoscale models for liquid films on solid surfaces.
Findings
DFT-derived binding potentials match mesoscale droplet profiles.
Oscillatory decay of binding potential at low temperatures.
Formation of terraced liquid droplets due to oscillatory interactions.
Abstract
For a film of liquid on a solid surface, the binding potential gives the free energy as a function of the film thickness and also the closely related structural disjoining pressure . The wetting behaviour of the liquid is encoded in the binding potential and the equilibrium film thickness corresponds to the value at the minimum of . Here, the method we developed in [J. Chem. Phys. 142, 074702 (2015)], and applied with a simple discrete lattice-gas model, is used with continuum density functional theory (DFT) to calculate the binding potential for a Lennard-Jones fluid and other simple liquids. The DFT used is based on fundamental measure theory and so incorporates the influence of the layered packing of molecules at the surface and the corresponding oscillatory density profile. The binding potential is frequently input in mesoscale…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
