The Importance of being consistent
Adam Wasserman, Jonathan Nafziger, Kaili Jiang, Min-Cheol Kim, Eunji, Sim, Kieron Burke

TL;DR
This paper emphasizes the critical role of self-consistency in density functional theory (DFT), analyzing how errors originate from approximate functionals versus densities, and demonstrating that improving densities can significantly reduce errors.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive analysis of self-consistency in various DFT methods, offering new insights into error sources and strategies for error reduction.
Findings
Errors often stem from approximate densities rather than functionals.
Using better densities can substantially reduce DFT errors.
The analysis applies to Kohn-Sham, orbital-free DFT, and Partition-DFT.
Abstract
We review the role of self-consistency in density functional theory. We apply a recent analysis to both Kohn-Sham and orbital-free DFT, as well as to Partition-DFT, which generalizes all aspects of standard DFT. In each case, the analysis distinguishes between errors in approximate functionals versus errors in the self-consistent density. This yields insights into the origins of many errors in DFT calculations, especially those often attributed to self-interaction or delocalization error. In many classes of problems, errors can be substantially reduced by using `better' densities. We review the history of these approaches, many of their applications, and give simple pedagogical examples.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies · Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions · Inorganic Fluorides and Related Compounds
