Constraints on the Progenitor of SN 2016gkg From Its Shock-Cooling Light Curve
Iair Arcavi, Griffin Hosseinzadeh, Peter J. Brown, Stephen J. Smartt,, Stefano Valenti, Leonardo Tartaglia, Anthony L. Piro, Jose L. Sanchez, Brent, Nicholls, Berto L.A.G. Monard, D. Andrew Howell, Curtis McCully, David J., Sand, John Tonry, Larry Denneau, Brian Stalder

TL;DR
This study uses detailed early light-curve data and analytical models to constrain the size and envelope mass of SN 2016gkg's progenitor, providing insights into its nature and limitations of current models.
Contribution
First detailed multi-band, intranight-cadence observations of SN 2016gkg's early light curve and analytical modeling to estimate progenitor properties.
Findings
Progenitor radius estimated at 25-140 solar radii.
Extended envelope mass estimated at 0.02-0.3 solar masses.
Shock-cooling model radii are on the lower end compared to pre-explosion imaging.
Abstract
SN 2016gkg is a nearby Type IIb supernova discovered shortly after explosion. Like several other Type IIb events with early-time data, SN 2016gkg displays a double-peaked light curve, with the first peak associated with the cooling of a low-mass extended progenitor envelope. We present unprecedented intranight-cadence multi-band photometric coverage of the first light-curve peak of SN 2016gkg obtained from the Las Cumbres Observatory Global Telescope network, the Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System, the Swift satellite and various amateur-operated telescopes. Fitting these data to analytical shock-cooling models gives a progenitor radius of ~25-140 solar radii with ~2-30 x 10^-2 solar masses of material in the extended envelope (depending on the model and the assumed host-galaxy extinction). Our radius estimates are broadly consistent with values derived independently (in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
