Separating detection and catalog production
Mohammad Akhlaghi

TL;DR
This paper proposes a modular approach to astronomical data processing, separating detection from catalog production, to enhance flexibility and scientific creativity in large survey data analysis.
Contribution
It introduces a novel modular system with separate software for detection and catalog creation, enabling more flexible and creative analysis pipelines.
Findings
Non-parametric detection at very low surface brightness levels
Modular system improves pipeline flexibility
Empowers scientific experimentation
Abstract
In the coming era of massive surveys (e.g. LSST, SKA), the role of the database designers and the algorithms they choose to adopt becomes the decisive factor in scientific progress. Systems that allow/encourage users/scientists to be more creative with the reduction/analysis algorithms can greatly enhance scientific productivity. The separation/modularity of the detection processes and catalog production is one proposal for achieving `Reduction/analysis algorithms for large databases and vice versa' (a key theme for the 26th ADASS). With the new noise-based detection paradigm, non-parametric detection is now possible for astronomical objects to very low surface brightness limits. In our implementation, one software (NoiseChisel) is in charge of detection and another (MakeCatalog) is in charge of catalog production. This modularity has many advantages for pipeline developers, and more…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAstronomical Observations and Instrumentation · Astronomy and Astrophysical Research · Scientific Research and Discoveries
