TOV or OV?, the whole story
L. Herrera

TL;DR
This paper critically examines the claim that the hydrostatic equilibrium equation should be called the 'Oppenheimer-Volkoff' equation instead of 'Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff', arguing that the existing literature does not support this change.
Contribution
It clarifies the historical and bibliographical basis for the traditional naming of the TOV equation and refutes the recent claim for renaming it as OV.
Findings
The claim for renaming is not supported by existing references.
Historical bibliography favors the TOV designation.
The paper emphasizes the importance of proper attribution.
Abstract
In a recent manuscript published in the Arxives (arXiv:1610.03049v1), it is claimed that it should be more appropriate to refer to the equation of hydrostatic equilibrium in a static spherically symmetric spacetime, supported by an isotropic perfect fluid, as the "Oppenheimer-Volkoff (OV) equation", instead of the "Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff (TOV)", as is frequently done. As we shall see in this brief note, such a claim is not supported by the existing bibliography.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCosmology and Gravitation Theories · Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research · Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
