
TL;DR
This paper discusses the interpretation of p-values as measures of model approximation quality, emphasizing that models are approximations rather than true representations, and introduces approximation regions distinct from confidence regions.
Contribution
It introduces the concept of approximation regions for model assessment and clarifies the interpretation of p-values as indicators of approximation quality.
Findings
Small p-values indicate poor model approximation
Approximation regions are distinct from confidence regions
Models are treated as approximations, not true representations
Abstract
Models are consistently treated as approximations and all procedures are consistent with this. They do not treat the model as being true. In this context -values are one measure of approximation, a small -value indicating a poor approximation. Approximation regions are defined and distinguished from confidence regions.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNumerical Methods and Algorithms · Neural Networks and Applications
