Odd Harmonics in Exoplanet Photometry: Weather or Artifact?

TL;DR

This paper investigates the origins of odd harmonic signals in exoplanet photometry, distinguishing between artifacts and genuine weather-related phenomena, and emphasizes the importance of accurate transit modeling for reliable detection.

Contribution

It clarifies that previous claims of large odd harmonics are artifacts and highlights the need for careful transit removal, also discussing how weather could produce odd harmonics under certain conditions.

Findings

Previous large odd harmonic claims are artifacts of transit removal.

Reliable odd harmonic detections are from HAT-P-7b and Kepler-13Ab.

Infrared variability limits make weather-based explanations unlikely.

Abstract

Photometry of short-period planetary systems allows astronomers to monitor exoplanets, their host stars, and their mutual interactions. In addition to the transits of a planet in front of its star and the eclipses of the planet by its star, researchers have reported flux variations at the orbital frequency and its harmonics: planetary reflection and/or emission and Doppler beaming of starlight produce one peak per orbit, while ellipsoidal variations of a tidally distorted star and/or planet produce two maxima per orbit. Researchers have also reported significant photometric variability at three times the orbital frequency, sometimes much greater than the predictions of tidal theory. The reflected phase variations of a homogeneous planet contains power at even orbital harmonics-important for studies of ellipsoidal variations-but cannot contain odd orbital harmonics. We show that odd harmonics can, however, be produced by an edge-on planet with a time-variable map, or an inclined planet with a North-South (N-S) asymmetric map. Either of these scenarios entail weather: short-period planets are expected to have zero obliquity and hence N-S symmetric stellar forcing. North-South asymmetry in a giant planet would therefore suggest stochastic localized features, such as weather. However, we find that previous claims of large-amplitude odd modes in Kepler photometry are artifacts of removing planetary transits rather than modeling them. The only reliable claims of odd harmonics remain HAT-P-7b and Kepler-13Ab, for which the third mode amplitude is 6-8% of the planetary flux. Although time-variable albedo maps could in principle explain these odd harmonics, upper-limits on the infrared variability of hot Jupiters make this hypothesis unlikely. We urge theorists to study the effects of close-in planets on stellar atmospheres, as this remains the only plausible hypothesis.