Target and beam-target spin asymmetries in exclusive pion electroproduction for $Q^2>1$ GeV$^2$. II. $e p \rightarrow e \pi^0 p$
P.E. Bosted, A. Kim, K.P. Adhikari, D. Adikaram, Z. Akbar, M.J., Amaryan, S. Anefalos Pereira, H. Avakian, R.A. Badui, J. Ball, I. Balossino,, M. Battaglieri, I. Bedlinskiy, A.S. Biselli, S. Boiarinov, W.J. Briscoe, W.K., Brooks, S. B\"ultmann, V.D. Burkert, T. Cao, D.S. Carman

TL;DR
This study measures beam-target and target single-spin asymmetries in exclusive neutral pion electroproduction at high momentum transfer, providing new data to constrain nucleon resonance models at moderate to large Q^2 values.
Contribution
It presents the first comprehensive measurement of spin asymmetries in e p → e π^0 p at Q^2 > 1 GeV^2, expanding understanding of nucleon resonances and their amplitudes.
Findings
Beam-target asymmetries are generally positive with modest phi dependence.
Target asymmetries show strong phi dependence and sign change between low and high W.
Results agree with previous models at low W but differ significantly at higher W.
Abstract
Beam-target double-spin asymmetries and target single-spin asymmetries were measured for the exclusive electroproduction reaction , expanding an analysis of the reaction from the same experiment. The results were obtained from scattering of 6 GeV longitudinally polarized electrons off longitudinally polarized protons using the CEBAF Large Acceptance Spectrometer at Jefferson Lab. The kinematic range covered is GeV and GeV. Results were obtained for about 5700 bins in , , \cthcm, and . The beam-target asymmetries were found to generally be greater than zero, with relatively modest \phicmsp dependence. The target asymmetries exhibit very strong \phicmsp dependence, with a change in sign occurring between results at low and high , in contrast to electroproduction. Reasonable…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
