TL;DR
This paper introduces a scale-constrained unsupervised evaluation method for multi-scale image segmentation that adapts to different target scales, improving evaluation accuracy over existing methods.
Contribution
It proposes a novel evaluation approach using regional saliency and merging cost, standardized into spectral distances, tailored for multi-scale segmentation assessment.
Findings
Outperforms four existing unsupervised evaluation methods
Effective in multi-scale segmentation quality assessment
Establishes a relationship between image features and segmentation quality
Abstract
Unsupervised evaluation of segmentation quality is a crucial step in image segmentation applications. Previous unsupervised evaluation methods usually lacked the adaptability to multi-scale segmentation. A scale-constrained evaluation method that evaluates segmentation quality according to the specified target scale is proposed in this paper. First, regional saliency and merging cost are employed to describe intra-region homogeneity and inter-region heterogeneity, respectively. Subsequently, both of them are standardized into equivalent spectral distances of a predefined region. Finally, by analyzing the relationship between image characteristics and segmentation quality, we establish the evaluation model. Experimental results show that the proposed method outperforms four commonly used unsupervised methods in multi-scale evaluation tasks.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
