Shared information between residues is sufficient to detect pair-wise epistasis in a protein
A. Gupta, C. Adami

TL;DR
This paper discusses whether shared information between residues in a protein is sufficient to detect pair-wise epistasis, addressing a challenge to the idea that shared entropy implies epistatic interactions.
Contribution
The authors clarify that shared entropy between residues can indicate epistasis, countering previous skepticism and providing insights into detecting epistatic interactions in proteins.
Findings
Shared entropy can indicate epistasis between residues
Shared entropy does not necessarily imply direct epistasis
The paper clarifies the relationship between information sharing and epistasis
Abstract
In a comment on our manuscript "Strong selection significantly increases epistatic interactions in the long-term evolution of a protein", Dr. Crona challenges our assertion that shared entropy (that is, information) between two residues implies epistasis between those residues, by constructing an explicit example of three loci (say A, B, and C), where A and B are epistatically linked (leading to shared entropy between A and B), and A and C also depend epistatically (leading to shared entropy between A and C), so that loci B and C are correlated (share entropy).
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsProtein Structure and Dynamics · Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications · Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
