An improved effective-one-body model of spinning, nonprecessing binary black holes for the era of gravitational-wave astrophysics with advanced detectors
Alejandro Boh\'e, Lijing Shao, Andrea Taracchini, Alessandra Buonanno,, Stanislav Babak, Ian W. Harry, Ian Hinder, Serguei Ossokine, Michael, P\"urrer, Vivien Raymond, Tony Chu, Heather Fong, Prayush Kumar, Harald P., Pfeiffer, Michael Boyle, Daniel A. Hemberger

TL;DR
This paper enhances the effective-one-body waveform model for spinning, nonprecessing binary black holes, calibrated with extensive numerical relativity data, achieving over 99% faithfulness at Advanced LIGO sensitivities and enabling faster data analysis.
Contribution
The authors develop an improved EOB waveform model calibrated with a large set of NR simulations, extending accuracy to higher mass ratios and spins, and create a reduced-order model for rapid waveform generation.
Findings
Faithfulness above 99% against NR waveforms at LIGO sensitivity.
Calibration includes larger mass ratios and spins, improving model accuracy.
Reduced-order model speeds up waveform generation by orders of magnitude.
Abstract
We improve the accuracy of the effective-one-body (EOB) waveforms that were employed during the first observing run of Advanced LIGO for binaries of spinning, nonprecessing black holes by calibrating them to a set of 141 numerical-relativity (NR) waveforms. The NR simulations expand the domain of calibration towards larger mass ratios and spins, as compared to the previous EOBNR model. Merger-ringdown waveforms computed in black-hole perturbation theory for Kerr spins close to extremal provide additional inputs to the calibration. For the inspiral-plunge phase, we use a Markov-chain Monte Carlo algorithm to efficiently explore the calibration space. For the merger-ringdown phase, we fit the NR signals with phenomenological formulae. After extrapolation of the calibrated model to arbitrary mass ratios and spins, the (dominant-mode) EOBNR waveforms have faithfulness --- at design…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
