Near-infrared thermal emission from near-Earth asteroids: Aspect-dependent variability
Nicholas A. Moskovitz, David Polishook, Francesca E. DeMeo, Richard P., Binzel, Thomas Endicott, Bin Yang, Ellen S. Howell, Ronald J. Vervack Jr.,, Yanga R. Fernandez

TL;DR
This study investigates how near-infrared thermal emission variability from near-Earth asteroids can reveal their physical properties, emphasizing the importance of viewing geometry and phase angle in thermal modeling.
Contribution
It demonstrates the potential of near-IR thermal observations combined with NEATM to constrain asteroid properties, highlighting the need for systematic wavelength comparisons.
Findings
Thermal variability can inform about asteroid pole orientation and thermal inertia.
High phase angle thermal measurements are diagnostically valuable.
Near-IR NEATM parameters tend to be higher than those from longer wavelengths.
Abstract
Here we explore a technique for constraining physical properties of near-Earth asteroids (NEAs) based on variability in thermal emission as a function of viewing aspect. We present case studies of the low albedo, near-Earth asteroids (285263) 1998 QE2 and (175706) 1996 FG3. The Near-Earth Asteroid Thermal Model (NEATM) is used to fit signatures of thermal emission in near-infrared (0.8 - 2.5 micron) spectral data. This analysis represents a systematic study of thermal variability in the near-IR as a function of phase angle. The observations of QE2 imply that carefully timed observations from multiple viewing geometries can be used to constrain physical properties like retrograde versus prograde pole orientation and thermal inertia. The FG3 results are more ambiguous with detected thermal variability possibly due to systematic issues with NEATM, an unexpected prograde rotation state, or…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
