Compositional phase stability of strongly correlated electron materials within DFT+$U$

TL;DR

This paper investigates how DFT+U predicts phase stability in strongly correlated electron materials, revealing the importance of charge ordering and its limitations, and suggesting the need for more advanced methods like DFT+DMFT.

Contribution

It introduces a spectral decomposition of DFT+U energy and analyzes the effects of local correlations on phase stability, highlighting the critical role of charge ordering.

Findings

DFT+U qualitatively matches experimental phase stability for some materials.

Charge ordering significantly influences energetics at intermediate compositions.

Unphysical charge ordering in DFT+U affects predicted transition temperatures.

Abstract

Predicting the compositional phase stability of strongly correlated electron materials is an outstanding challenge in condensed matter physics. In this work, we employ the DFT+U formalism to address the effects of local correlations due to transition metal d electrons on compositional phase stability in the prototype phase stable and separating materials LixCoO2 and olivine LixFePO4, respectively. We exploit a new spectral decomposition of the DFT+U total energy, revealing the distinct roles of the filling and ordering of the d orbital correlated subspace. The on-site interaction U drives both of these very different materials systems towards phase separation, stemming from enhanced ordering of the d orbital occupancies in the x=0 and x=1 species, whereas changes in the overall filling of the d shell contribute negligibly. We show that DFT+U formation energies are qualitatively consistent with experiments for phase stable LixCoO2, phase separating LixFePO4, and phase stable LixCoPO4. However, we find that charge ordering plays a critical role in the energetics at intermediate x, strongly dampening the tendency for the Hubbard U to drive phase separation. Most relevantly, the phase stability of Li1/2CoO2 within DFT+U is qualitatively incorrect without allowing charge ordering, which is problematic given that neither charge ordering nor the band gap that it induces are observed in experiment. We demonstrate that charge ordering arises from the correlated subspace interaction energy as opposed to the double counting. Additionally, we predict the Li order-disorder transition temperature for Li1/2CoO2, demonstrating that the unphysical charge ordering within DFT+U renders the method problematic, often producing unrealistically large results. Our findings motivate the need for other advanced techniques, such as DFT+DMFT, for total energies in strongly correlated materials.