NP-Hardness of Reed-Solomon Decoding, and the Prouhet-Tarry-Escott Problem
Venkata Gandikota, Badih Ghazi, Elena Grigorescu

TL;DR
This paper proves NP-hardness for decoding Reed-Solomon codes at error rates below the maximum likelihood radius, introduces the Moments Subset Sum problem, and links it to the Prouhet-Tarry-Escott problem, highlighting new computational complexity insights.
Contribution
It establishes the first NP-hardness results for Reed-Solomon decoding at smaller radii and connects this to a new number theory problem, advancing understanding of decoding complexity.
Findings
NP-hard to decode beyond N-K- c(log N)/(log log N) errors
NP-hard under quasipolynomial reductions for errors > N-K- c log N
Introduces the Moments Subset Sum problem and links it to Prouhet-Tarry-Escott problem
Abstract
Establishing the complexity of {\em Bounded Distance Decoding} for Reed-Solomon codes is a fundamental open problem in coding theory, explicitly asked by Guruswami and Vardy (IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 2005). The problem is motivated by the large current gap between the regime when it is NP-hard, and the regime when it is efficiently solvable (i.e., the Johnson radius). We show the first NP-hardness results for asymptotically smaller decoding radii than the maximum likelihood decoding radius of Guruswami and Vardy. Specifically, for Reed-Solomon codes of length and dimension , we show that it is NP-hard to decode more than errors (with an absolute constant). Moreover, we show that the problem is NP-hard under quasipolynomial-time reductions for an error amount (with an absolute constant). These results follow…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
