Comments on the paper "Terminal retrograde turn of rolling rings"
Alexey V. Borisov, Alexander A. Kilin, Yury L. Karavaev

TL;DR
This paper challenges previous explanations of the retrograde turn of rolling rings, showing through experiments and theory that aerodynamic drag is not the primary cause, and that such motion can occur in both rings and disks without slipping.
Contribution
It provides experimental and theoretical evidence that the retrograde turn is not mainly caused by aerodynamic effects, broadening understanding of rolling dynamics.
Findings
Drag torque is not the main cause of retrograde turn.
Retrograde turn can occur in both rings and disks without slipping.
Theoretical analysis supports the possibility of retrograde motion in different shapes.
Abstract
Mir Abbas Jalali et al. [Phys. Rev. E 92, 032913(2015)] explained the retrograde turn of rings by aerodynamic phenomena due to the presence of a central hole in the ring as opposed to a disk. The results of our experiments suggest that the drag torque is not the main reason for the retrograde turn of the rings, and the results of theoretical research have shown that such a motion is possible for both the ring and the disk in the case of rolling without slipping.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRailway Engineering and Dynamics · Vibration and Dynamic Analysis · Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis
