Comment on "Breakdown of Interference Rules in Azulene, a Nonalternant Hydrocarbon"
Robert Stadler

TL;DR
This paper clarifies the applicability of a graphical scheme for predicting quantum interference effects in conjugated pi systems, demonstrating its validity for nonalternant hydrocarbons like Azulene when correctly applied.
Contribution
It corrects previous misconceptions by showing the graphical scheme is universally applicable to conjugated pi systems, including nonalternant hydrocarbons, under proper application.
Findings
The apparent disagreement with previous predictions is resolved with correct application.
The graphical scheme is valid for all conjugated pi systems, regardless of alternant or nonalternant nature.
Correct application yields results consistent with theoretical simulations.
Abstract
Quantum interference (QI) effects in molecular systems are a topic of emerging interest in electron transport studies of single molecule junctions. In a recent Letter, Xia et al. employed a graphical scheme introduced by my colleagues and myself that enables to distinguish between molecular topologies in conjugated pi systems which exhibit QI effects in their conductance from those who do not. They claimed that this scheme is not applicable for nonalternant hydrocarbons, in particular Azulenes (Az), whose transport properties were studied both theoretically and experimentally by connecting the electrodes at Az's 1,3-, 2,6-, 4,7-, and 5,7-positions, respectively. An apparent disagreement has been identified between the predictions of our scheme referred to as "atom- or bond-counting model" and theoretical simulations for featureless, wide band electrodes in the GW approximation as well…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
