Interrogating surface length spectra and quantifying isospectrality
Hugo Parlier

TL;DR
This paper investigates how the length spectrum of hyperbolic surfaces determines their geometry, providing bounds on the number of questions needed and on the count of isospectral but non-isometric surfaces.
Contribution
It offers a quantitative analysis of inverse spectral problems, establishing bounds on questions needed for spectrum determination and on isospectral surface counts.
Findings
Quantitative bounds on questions needed to determine length spectra
Upper bounds on the number of isospectral non-isometric surfaces
Insights into the relationship between spectra and surface geometry
Abstract
This article is about inverse spectral problems for hyperbolic surfaces and in particular how length spectra relate to the geometry of the underlying surface. A quantitative answer is given to the following: how many questions do you need to ask a length spectrum to determine it completely? In answering this, a quantitative upper bound is given on the number of isospectral but non-isometric surfaces of a given genus.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
