Algorithmic Discrepancy Beyond Partial Coloring
Nikhil Bansal, Shashwat Garg

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new algorithmic framework that surpasses the partial coloring method, leading to improved bounds and algorithms for classic discrepancy problems like Tusnady's and Steinitz, with broad applicability.
Contribution
The authors develop a general framework that overcomes partial coloring limitations, providing new algorithms with better bounds for discrepancy problems such as Tusnady's and Steinitz.
Findings
Achieved $O( ext{log}^2 n)$ discrepancy bound for axis-parallel rectangles.
Provided an $O_d( ext{log}^d n)$ bound for $d$-dimensional boxes.
Matched non-constructive bounds for the Steinitz problem in $ ext{ell}_ ext{infty}$ case.
Abstract
The partial coloring method is one of the most powerful and widely used method in combinatorial discrepancy problems. However, in many cases it leads to sub-optimal bounds as the partial coloring step must be iterated a logarithmic number of times, and the errors can add up in an adversarial way. We give a new and general algorithmic framework that overcomes the limitations of the partial coloring method and can be applied in a black-box manner to various problems. Using this framework, we give new improved bounds and algorithms for several classic problems in discrepancy. In particular, for Tusnady's problem, we give an improved bound for discrepancy of axis-parallel rectangles and more generally an bound for -dimensional boxes in . Previously, even non-constructively, the best bounds were and …
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMathematical Approximation and Integration · Digital Image Processing Techniques · Analytic Number Theory Research
