Parsimony, model adequacy and periodic correlation in forecasting time series
A. Ian McLeod

TL;DR
This paper emphasizes the importance of parsimony and model adequacy, especially incorporating seasonal periodic correlation, for improving the accuracy of seasonal river flow forecasts and critiques standard methods.
Contribution
It introduces a new diagnostic check for periodic correlation in ARMA models and demonstrates its importance in selecting adequate models for seasonal river flow forecasting.
Findings
Many seasonal economic time series exhibit periodic correlation.
Standard ARMA models are often inadequate for seasonal river flow.
Combining forecasts from inadequate models can improve performance.
Abstract
The merits of the modelling philosophy of Box \& Jenkins (1970) are illustrated with a summary of our recent work on seasonal river flow forecasting. Specifically, this work demonstrates that the principle of parsimony, which has been questioned by several authors recently, is helpful in selecting the best model for forecasting seasonal river flow. Our work also demonstrates the importance of model adequacy. An adequate model for seasonal river flow must incorporate seasonal periodic correlation. The usual autoregressive-moving average (ARMA) and seasonal ARMA models are not adequate in this respect for seasonal river flow time series. A new diagnostic check, for detecting periodic correlation in fitted ARMA models is developed in this paper. This diagnostic check is recommended for routine use when fitting seasonal ARMA models. It is shown that this diagnostic check indicates that many…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
