The Spatially Resolved [CII] Cooling Line Deficit in Galaxies
J.D.T. Smith (UToledo), Kevin Croxall, Bruce Draine, Ilse De Looze,, Karin Sandstrom, Lee Armus, Pedro Beirao, Alberto Bolatto, Mederic Boquien,, Bernhard Brandl, Alison Crocker, Daniel A. Dale, Maud Galametz, Brent Groves,, George Helou, Rodrigo Herrera-Camus, Leslie Hunt

TL;DR
This study analyzes [CII] 158um emission across over 15,000 regions in 54 nearby galaxies, revealing how the [CII] cooling line deficit correlates with star formation rate density, metallicity, and local physical conditions, providing insights into interstellar gas processes.
Contribution
It offers the first large-scale resolved analysis of the [CII] line deficit, establishing its dependence on star formation rate density and metallicity, and providing a method to estimate SFRD from [CII]/TIR ratios.
Findings
[CII]/TIR ratio varies from >1% to <0.1% across regions.
Star formation rate density correlates with the depth of the [CII] deficit.
Metallicity influences the deficit, with higher metallicity showing deeper deficits.
Abstract
We present [CII] 158um measurements from over 15,000 resolved regions within 54 nearby galaxies of the KINGFISH program to investigate the so-called [CII] "line cooling deficit" long known to occur in galaxies with different luminosities. The [CII]/TIR ratio ranges from above 1% to below 0.1% in the sample, with a mean value of 0.48+-0.21%. We find that the surface density of 24um emission dominates this trend, with [CII]/TIR dropping as nuInu{24um} increases. Deviations from this overall decline are correlated with changes in the gas phase metal abundance, with higher metallicity associated with deeper deficits at a fixed surface brightness. We supplement the local sample with resolved [CII] measurements from nearby luminous infrared galaxies and high redshift sources from z=1.8-6.4, and find that star formation rate density drives a continuous trend of deepening [CII] deficit across…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
