3.5-Year Monitoring of 225 GHz Opacity at the Summit of Greenland

TL;DR

This study presents a 3.5-year monitoring of 225 GHz atmospheric opacity at Greenland Summit Camp, revealing seasonal variations, comparison with other sites, and implications for submillimeter astronomy, especially during polar night conditions.

Contribution

First comprehensive long-term opacity data at Greenland Summit, demonstrating its potential for submillimeter astronomy and comparing its atmospheric transparency with other major sites.

Findings

Greenland site shows seasonal opacity variation with lower values in winter.

Approximately 50% of winter time has opacities suitable for 450-1000 GHz observations.

Long stable low-opacity periods (>100 hours) are possible during polar night.

Abstract

We present the 3.5-yr monitoring results of 225 GHz opacity at the summit of the Greenland ice sheet (Greenland Summit Camp) at an altitude of 3200 m using a tipping radiometer. We chose this site as our submillimeter telescope (Greenland Telescope; GLT) site, because its location offers favorable baselines to existing submillimeter telescopes for global-scale VLBI. The site shows a clear seasonal variation with the average opacity lower by a factor of two during winter. For the winter quartiles of 25% and 50%, the Greenland site is about 10%-30% worse than the ALMA or the South Pole sites. Estimated atmospheric transmission spectra in winter season are similar to the ALMA site at lower frequencies (<450 GHz), which are transparent enough to perform astronomical observations almost all of the winter time with opacities <0.5, but 10%-25% higher opacities at higher frequencies (>450 GHz) than those at the ALMA site. This is due to the lower altitude of the Greenland site. Nevertheless, half of the winter time at the Greenland site can be used for astronomical observations at frequencies between 450 GHz and 1000 GHz with opacities <1.2, and 10% of the time show >10% transmittance in the THz (1035 GHz, 1350 GHz, and 1500 GHz) windows. One major advantage of the Greenland site in winter is that there is no diurnal variation due to the polar night condition, and therefore the durations of low-opacity conditions are significantly longer than at the ALMA site. Opacities lower than 0.05 or 0.04 can continue for more than 100 hours. Such long stable opacity conditions do not occur as often even at the South Pole; it happens only for the opacity lower than 0.05. Since the opacity variation is directly related to the sky temperature (background) variation, the Greenland site is suitable for astronomical observations that need unusually stable sky background.