Energetic constraints on electromagnetic signals from double black hole mergers
Lixin Dai, Jonathan C. McKinney, M. Coleman Miller (University of, Maryland)

TL;DR
This paper examines the energetic constraints on electromagnetic signals from double black hole mergers, showing that stellar destruction due to dynamical friction limits electromagnetic counterpart formation, but close-center mergers could produce observable gravitational waveform modifications.
Contribution
It demonstrates that heat from dynamical friction likely destroys the star unless black holes form very close to the center, affecting electromagnetic signals and gravitational waveforms.
Findings
Dynamical friction heat can exceed stellar binding energy, destroying the star.
Electromagnetic counterparts are unlikely unless black holes form near the star's center.
Close-center black hole formation can accelerate coalescence and modify gravitational wave signals.
Abstract
The possible Fermi detection of an electromagnetic counterpart to the double black hole merger GW150914 has inspired many theoretical models, some of which propose that the holes spiraled together inside a massive star. However, we show that the heat produced by the dynamical friction on such black hole orbits can exceed the stellar binding energy by a large factor, which means that this heat could destroy the star and thus make it difficult for enough gas to be near the holes at merger to produce detectable photons. These considerations must be taken into account when models are proposed for electromagnetic counterparts to the coalescence of two stellar-mass black holes. We find that only when the two black holes form very close to the center can the star avoid destruction. In that case, dynamical friction can make the black holes coalesce faster than they would in vacuum, which leads…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
