Blinded sample size re-estimation in three-arm trials with 'gold standard' design
Tobias M\"utze, Tim Friede

TL;DR
This paper evaluates blinded sample size re-estimation methods in three-arm 'gold standard' clinical trials with normally distributed outcomes, proposing an inflation factor to improve power accuracy.
Contribution
It compares various variance estimators for sample size re-estimation and introduces an inflation factor for the Xing-Ganju estimator to achieve proper trial power.
Findings
One-sample variance estimator leads to overpowered trials.
Unbiased estimators like Xing-Ganju cause underpowered trials without adjustment.
The proposed inflation factor balances power and maintains trial integrity.
Abstract
The sample size of a clinical trial relies on information about nuisance parameters such as the outcome variance. When no or only limited information is available, it has been proposed to include an internal pilot study in the design of the trial. Based on the results of the internal pilot study, the initially planned sample size can be adjusted. In this paper, we study blinded sample size re-estimation in the 'gold standard' design for normally distributed outcomes. The 'gold standard' design is a three-arm clinical trial design which includes an active and a placebo control in addition to an experimental treatment. We compare several sample size re-estimation procedures in a simulation study assessing operating characteristics including power and type I error. We find that sample size re-estimation based on the popular one-sample variance estimator results in overpowered trials.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
