Beyond Exchangeability: The Chinese Voting Process
Moontae Lee, Seok Hyun Jin, David Mimno

TL;DR
The paper introduces the Chinese Voting Process, a model capturing how helpfulness votes in online communities evolve influenced by social reinforcement, position, and presentation biases, with evaluation on Amazon reviews and StackExchange data.
Contribution
It presents a novel probabilistic model for voting dynamics that accounts for social influence and biases, advancing understanding of online response evaluation.
Findings
Model accurately captures voting behavior dynamics
Reveals community-specific behavioral coefficients
Improves assessment of response quality
Abstract
Many online communities present user-contributed responses such as reviews of products and answers to questions. User-provided helpfulness votes can highlight the most useful responses, but voting is a social process that can gain momentum based on the popularity of responses and the polarity of existing votes. We propose the Chinese Voting Process (CVP) which models the evolution of helpfulness votes as a self-reinforcing process dependent on position and presentation biases. We evaluate this model on Amazon product reviews and more than 80 StackExchange forums, measuring the intrinsic quality of individual responses and behavioral coefficients of different communities.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComplex Network Analysis Techniques · Expert finding and Q&A systems · Topic Modeling
