A studentized permutation test for three-arm trials in the 'gold standard' design
Tobias M\"utze, Frank Konietschke, Axel Munk, Tim Friede

TL;DR
This paper introduces a studentized permutation test for three-arm 'gold standard' clinical trials, improving non-inferiority testing accuracy especially with small samples and non-normal data, outperforming traditional methods.
Contribution
The paper develops and evaluates a novel studentized permutation test specifically designed for three-arm 'gold standard' trial designs, addressing limitations of parametric tests.
Findings
The permutation test maintains proper significance levels in small samples.
It outperforms Wald-type tests for count data in simulations.
The method is implemented in the R package ThreeArmedTrials.
Abstract
The 'gold standard' design for three-arm trials refers to trials with an active control and a placebo control in addition to the experimental treatment group. This trial design is recommended when being ethically justifiable and it allows the simultaneous comparison of experimental treatment, active control, and placebo. Parametric testing methods have been studied plentifully over the past years. However, these methods often tend to be liberal or conservative when distributional assumptions are not met particularly with small sample sizes. In this article, we introduce a studentized permutation test for testing non-inferiority and superiority of the experimental treatment compared to the active control in three-arm trials in the `gold standard' design. The performance of the studentized permutation test for finite sample sizes is assessed in a Monte-Carlo simulation study under various…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
